@article {miscione2017narratingdata,
	title = {Narrating the Stories of Leaked Data},
	journal = {Discourse, Context \& Media},
	year = {2017},
	month = {Oct},
	publisher = {Elsevier BV},
	doi = {10.1016/j.dcm.2017.02.002},
	author = {Miscione, G and Landert, D}
}
@article {landert2017narratingsnowden,
	title = {Narrating the stories of leaked data: The changing role of journalists after Wikileaks and Snowden},
	journal = {Discourse, Context and Media},
	volume = {19},
	year = {2017},
	month = {Oct},
	pages = {13{\textendash}21},
	abstract = {{\textcopyright} 2017 Elsevier Ltd Traditionally, investigative journalists had a gatekeeping role between their confidential sources of information and the public sphere. Over the last two decades and with the arrival of new media, this role has been undergoing changes. Recent cases of whistleblowing, such as WikiLeaks and Snowden, illustrate how contemporary media allow individuals to release data directly to the global audience. This raises the question of how recent leaks affect how journalists operate. In this study we compare how The Guardian covered two cases of whistleblowing which are commonly referred to as WikiLeaks and Snowden. We analyze how access to leaked data is provided or facilitated on The Guardian website, how readers are invited to interact with these data and how journalists present their own activities. A qualitative analysis of the leading articles further shows how the stories are framed and how much prominence is given to the data and the various actors. The results show how the roles of journalists shift from gatekeeping to data management, interpretation, contextualisation and narration. Journalists may no longer be needed to publish leaked data but they are still needed to tell the stories of leaked data.},
	issn = {2211-6958},
	doi = {10.1016/j.dcm.2017.02.002},
	author = {Landert, D and Miscione, G}
}
@article {landert2017narrating,
	title = {Narrating the stories of leaked data: The changing role of journalists after Wikileaks and Snowden},
	journal = {Discourse, Context \& Media},
	year = {2017},
	publisher = {Elsevier},
	author = {Landert, Daniela and Miscione, Gianluca}
}
@conference {2010theby,
	title = {The Narratives we Infrastructure By},
	year = {2010},
	month = {Sep}
}
@article {944,
	title = {A note on the effect of term weighting on selecting intrinsic dimensionality of data},
	journal = {Cybernetics and Information Technologies},
	volume = {9},
	number = {1},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {5-12},
	publisher = {Institute of Information Technologies - BAS},
	issn = {1311-9702},
	author = {Kumar, Ch. Aswani and Srinivas, S.}
}
@article {432,
	title = {Negotiating "Best Practices" in Package Software Implementation},
	journal = {Information \& Organization},
	volume = {18},
	number = {1},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {1-28},
	author = {Yeow, A. and Sia, S.K.}
}
@conference {miscione2008networksfederations,
	title = {Networks of Action and Health Information Infrastructure: enabling Federations},
	booktitle = {Theme: Towards an ICT Research Agenda for African Development},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {36{\textendash}36},
	author = {Miscione, G and Staring, K and Kanjo, C}
}
@article {252,
	title = {New Insights into Studying Agency and Information Technology},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004},
	pages = {653 - 654},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_37},
	author = {Tony Salvador and Jeremy Rose and Whitley, Edgar and Melanie Wilson}
}
@article {253,
	title = {Non-Dualism and Information Systems Research},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004},
	pages = {675 - 680},
	abstract = {This paper makes a case for the grounding of information systems research within theoretical frameworks that reject the idea of subject-object dualism. In support, two rationales are offered. (1)  Research in information systems exhibits an overwhelming dominance of positivistic research methodologies. Such positivistic research approaches have their roots in the scientific method, and in the attempt to transplant the scientific method from the context of the natural sciences to the context of the social sciences. Further, according to various theorists, the scientific method has its roots in the concept of subject-object dualism put forward by Descartes and others. Thus, this paper argues that IS researchers who wish to resist the current orthodoxy, and who seek to advance a non-positivistic research program, may find it useful to anchor their research within paradigmatic and theoretical frameworks that reject the concept of subject-object dualism. (2)  Research into differences in cognitive processes among distinct cultures suggests that there are differences between Western and Eastern ways of thinking. The Eastern mindset is typically more sympathetic to the notion of subject-object non-dualism than the Western mindset. This difference may have implications for the design of IS that rely heavily on modes of human cognition (e.g., knowledge management or decision support systems). This suggests that when considering certain cultural or cross-cultural contexts, IS researchers may benefit from grounding their assumptions within non-dualistic paradigmatic and theoretical frameworks.},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_43},
	author = {Jain, Abhijit}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/Atkinson02,
	title = {The Nature and Role of Generative Systemic Metaphor within Information Systems Planning and Development},
	year = {2002},
	pages = {323-343},
	author = {Christopher J. Atkinson}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/KaplanKST02,
	title = {New Words and Old Books: Challenging Conventional Discourses about Domain and Theory in Information Systems Research},
	year = {2002},
	pages = {539-545},
	author = {Bonnie Kaplan and Lynette Kvasny and Steve Sawyer and Eileen M. Trauth}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/Wilson01,
	title = {A New Paradigm for Considering Gender in Information Systems Development Research},
	year = {2001},
	pages = {353-366},
	author = {Melanie Wilson}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/LambD00,
	title = {The New Computing Archipelago: Intranet Islands of Practice},
	year = {2000},
	pages = {255-276},
	author = {Roberta Lamb and Elizabeth Davidson}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/Poster99,
	title = {Nations, Identities, and Global Technologies},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {11-12},
	author = {Mark Poster}
}
@booklet {919,
	title = {New Information Technologies in Organizational Processes: Field Studies and Theoretical Reflections on the Future of Work},
	year = {1999},
	publisher = {Kluwer Academic Publishers},
	address = {Norwell, MA},
	keywords = {IFIP 8.2},
	author = {Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama and Lucas D. Introna and Michael D. Myers and Janice I. DeGross}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/Gray92,
	title = {New Directions for Group Decision Support Systems},
	year = {1992},
	pages = {377-392},
	author = {Paul Gray}
}
@book {925,
	title = {New Zealand Cases in Information Systems},
	year = {1992},
	note = {Distributed in Australia by Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.},
	publisher = {Pagination Publishers},
	organization = {Pagination Publishers},
	edition = {2nd},
	address = {Auckland},
	author = {Sheffield, James and Michael D. Myers}
}
@article {vitalari,
	title = {{The Need for Longitudinal Designs in the Study of Computing Environments}},
	year = {1985},
	pages = {235{\textendash}258},
	publisher = {Elsevier Publishers},
	author = {Nicholas Vitalari}
}
