@article {759,
	title = {Bazaar by Design: Managing Interfirm Exchanges in an Open Source Service Network},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008},
	pages = {173 - 188},
	abstract = {As in many other sectors, competitive necessities are driving open source software companies to participate in cooperative business networks in order to offer the complete product and service offerings demanded by customers. This paper examines
 one such emerging business network archetype: an open source service network (OSSN). This type of business network is of particular
 interest as it not only addresses key challenges vis-{\`a}-vis OSS commercialization, but operates in a manner that overcomes
 exchange problems among participants by relying primarily on social mechanisms. The paper reveals the manifestation of social
 mechanisms in OSSNs and how these are used for coordinating and safeguarding exchanges between firms. Specifically, we illustrate
 the importance of (1) restricted access, (2) assessing the reputation of others, (3) a shared macroculture (goals and norms),
 and (4) collective sanctions for punishing firms who violate these goals and norms.
},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09768-8_12},
	author = {Joseph Feller and Finnegan, Patrick and Brian Fitzgerald and Hayes, Jeremy}
}
@article {782,
	title = {The Servicitization of Peer Production: Reflections on the Open Source Software Experience},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008},
	pages = {353 - 355},
	abstract = {The concept of what Yochai Benkler called {\textquotedblleft}peer production{\textquotedblright} as an alternative mechanism to traditional hierarchies and markets has captured the imagination of numerous communities in contexts ranging from t-shirt design to software to gold mining. While
 some question the suitability and potential longevity of this mode of production, others are focused on determining ways in
 which peer-produced products and services can be suitably packaged to meet the requirements of consumers. In particular, the
 mature peer production phenomenon known as open source software has emerged as a credible alternative to its proprietary counterpart
 and presents a compelling challenge to both industry and academia as we seek to understand how firms and other organizations
 can build sustainable business models leveraging the public commons of open source products and the collaborative engine that
 created them.
},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09768-8_27},
	author = {Joseph Feller and Finnegan, Patrick and Bj{\"o}rn Lundell and Nilsson, Olof}
}
@article {681,
	title = {Developing Open Source Software: A Community-Based Analysis of Research},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {261 - 278},
	abstract = {Open source software (OSS) creates the potential for the inclusion of large and diverse communities in every aspect of the software development and consumption life cycle. However, despite 6 years of effort by an ever growing research community,
 we still don{\textquoteright}t know exactly what we do and don{\textquoteright}t know about OSS, nor do we have a clear idea about the basis for our knowledge.
 This paper presents an analysis of 155 research artefacts in the area of open source software. The purpose of the study is
 to identify the kinds of open source project communities that have been researched, the kinds of research questions that have
 been asked, and the methodologies used by researchers. Emerging from the study is a clearer understanding of what we do and
 don{\textquoteright}t know about open source software, and recommendations for future research efforts
},
	doi = {10.1007/0-387-34588-4_18},
	author = {Joseph Feller and Finnegan, Patrick and Kelly, David and MacNamara, Maurice}
}
