@article {809,
	title = {The Emergence of {\textquoteleft}Power with{\textquoteright}: The Case of a Born Global Organization},
	volume = {301/2009},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {239 - 256},
	publisher = {Springer},
	chapter = {17},
	abstract = {Thanks to the advancement of Information and Communications Technologies, the past decade has seen the rise of Born Global organizations (Rennie, 1993; Oviatt and McDougall, 1994; Karra and Philips, 2004; Zahra, 2005). Broadly defined as {\textquoteleft}business organizations that, right from inception, seek to derive significant competitive advantages from the use of resources and the sales of outputs in multiple countries{\textquoteright} (Oviatt and McDougall, 1994: 49), Born Global organizations are small, young, and internationally dispersed. While sharing the characteristics of {\textquoteleft}smallness{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}newness{\textquoteright} of Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), Born Global organizations also bear {\textquoteleft}foreignness{\textquoteright}, similar to that of Multinational Corporations (Zahra, 2005). Born Globals therefore need to strike a balance between {\textquoteleft}global reach{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}local touch{\textquoteright} as in Multinational Corporations (Bartlett and Ghoshal, 1989); yet they have to do so with scare resources and organizational uncertainty similar to SMEs, and with {\textquoteleft}lean{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}mean{\textquoteright} communications afforded by ICT (e.g. Sproull and Kiesler, 1986). This study is an initial attempt to untangle the combined challenges in Born Globals{\textquoteright} innovative way of management. Through a longitudinal case study, we aim to explore the issue of power in a Born Global{\textquoteright}s endeavour to manage its global knowledge via technology mediation.
},
	issn = {978-3-642-02387-3},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02388-0_17},
	author = {Yan, Lin and Niki Panteli}
}
@article {803,
	title = {Knowledge Management in Small Firms},
	volume = {301/2009},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {192 - 210},
	publisher = {Springer},
	chapter = {14},
	abstract = {This paper explores knowledge management in small and medium-sized firms (SMEs). It investigates the use of Lotus Notes in SMEs of a developing country as a counterpoint to the large firm, developed country emphasis of existing research. It develops taxonomy of Lotus Notes use within the context of different knowledge management processes; notably communicating, co-ordinating and collaborating. The study employs an interpretive approach using three case studies. The key findings suggest that publishing, searching, sharing and retrieving are the user modes for enabling sharing and storing information. Evidence of knowledge creation is found at the departmental level but not at the organizational level. Further, small firms may explore more groupware potential than large organizations and this reflects their different context. Finally, implications for further research are identified.
},
	issn = {978-3-642-02387-3},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02388-0_14},
	author = {Panyasorn, Jessada and Niki Panteli and Powell, Philip}
}
@article {332,
	title = {Exploring the Nature of Virtuality},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {373 - 377},
	abstract = {There has been considerable interest in the topic of virtuality over the last few years among both academics and practitioners. The focus of attention has generally been on how to improve collaboration and knowledge sharing, how to develop trust and cohesiveness within virtual organizations, virtual teams and virtual communities, and how to best support virtual interactions. Underlying this research area is the assumption that we possess sufficient understanding about the nature of virtuality and that we know how to distinguish {\textquoteleft}what is virtual{\textquoteright} to {\textquoteleft}what is not virtual{\textquoteright}. Even though several of us have attempted on various occasions to make a contribution in this field, we increasingly recognize that the nature of virtuality has not been well conceptualized in the literature. Part of the reason for this is that researchers, including us, often have the tendency to compare the virtual (distributed and CMC-based) to the traditional (collocated, and face-to-face) environment. We question this purely technological distinction, but recognize that virtuality, as an IT-enabled phenomenon, is increasingly extending its reach, becoming more global and more pervasive across all spheres of society. The theme of this panel is to examine, appreciate, and debate the multi-dimensional nature of what virtuality has been, is, and may become-specifically, its global and local dimensions, including the different interpretations that are and should be given to these dimensions.},
	doi = {10.1007/978-0-387-73025-7_26},
	author = {Niki Panteli and Chiasson, Mike and Yan, Lin and Angeliki Poulymenakou and Papargyris, Anthony}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/TuckerP03,
	title = {Back to Basics: Sharing Goals and Developing Trust in Global Virtual Teams},
	year = {2003},
	pages = {85-98},
	author = {Robert J. Tucker and Niki Panteli}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/BarrettHOP02,
	title = {Discourse and Organizational Transformation in Information Systems Research},
	year = {2002},
	pages = {533-538},
	author = {Michael Barrett and Loizos Heracleous and Orlikowski, Wanda and Niki Panteli}
}
