@booklet {georgiadou2011enewsletterenewsletter,
	title = {e-Newsletter},
	year = {2011},
	author = {Georgiadou, Y and Miscione, G}
}
@article {georgiadou2011sensorsafrica,
	title = {Sensors, empowerment, and accountability: A digital earth view from East Africa},
	journal = {International Journal of Digital Earth},
	volume = {4},
	number = {4},
	year = {2011},
	month = {Jul},
	pages = {285{\textendash}304},
	abstract = {Several innovative {\textquoteright}participatory sensing{\textquoteright} initiatives are under way in East Africa. They can be seen as local manifestations of the global notion of Digital Earth. The initiatives aim to amplify the voice of ordinary citizens, improve citizens{\textquoteright} capacity to directly influence public service delivery and hold local government accountable. The popularity of these innovations is, among other things, a local reaction to the partial failure of the millennium development goals (MDGs) to deliver accurate statistics on public services in Africa. Empowered citizens, with access to standard mobile phones, can {\textquoteright}sense{\textquoteright} via text messages and report failures in the delivery of local government services. The public disclosure of these reports on the web and other mass media may pressure local authorities to take remedial action. In this paper, we outline the potential and research challenges of a {\textquoteright}participatory sensing{\textquoteright} platform, which we call a {\textquoteright}human sensor web.{\textquoteright} Digital Africa{\textquoteright}s first priority could be to harness continent-wide and national data as well as local information resources, collected by citizens, in order to monitor, measure and forecast MDGs. {\textcopyright} 2011 Taylor \&Francis.},
	issn = {1753-8947},
	doi = {10.1080/17538947.2011.585184},
	author = {Georgiadou, Y and Bana, B and Becht, R and Hoppe, R and Ikingura, J and Kraak, MJ and Lance, K and Lemmens, R and Lungo, JH and Mccall, M and Miscione, G and Verplanke, J}
}
@booklet {georgiadou2010theagendas,
	title = {The Citizen Edge: using Virtual Globes to Improve Participation in Setting Policy Agendas},
	year = {2010},
	publisher = {.},
	author = {Georgiadou, Y and Verplanke, J and Miscione, G and Martinez, J}
}
@inbook {verplanke2010citizenegovernment,
	title = {Citizen surveillance of the state: A mirror for egovernment?},
	volume = {328},
	year = {2010},
	month = {Jan},
	pages = {185{\textendash}201},
	abstract = {{\textcopyright} IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2010. This paper discusses, conceptually and empirically, the role of geographic ICT (geoICT) and virtual globes (e.g. Google Earth) at the interface of public policy and citizens. Our preliminary findings from on-going field work in an Indian city and in Zanzibar suggest that virtual globe technology can potentially transfer to citizens surveillance power, traditionally held by the government. Starting from the traditional electronic government framework, where bureaucracy acts as a filter between policy makers and citizens with grievances, we outline an emerging framework where commercial virtual globes act as mediators between policy-makers and citizens. We show that the emerging framework holds the potential of allowing citizens concerned, in our case, about the quality of water services, to influence policy makers directly. The virtual globe acts as a mirror to the traditional eGovernment framework and lends a different societal visibility both to public services provision, and to localized citizens{\textquoteright} needs.},
	isbn = {9783642154782},
	issn = {1868-4238},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-15479-9_19},
	author = {Verplanke, J and Martinez, J and Miscione, G and Georgiadou, Y and Coleman, D and Hassan, AA}
}
@article {verplankecitizenegovernment,
	title = {Citizen Surveillance of the State: A Mirror for eGovernment?},
	journal = {SSRN Electronic Journal},
	year = {2010},
	publisher = {Elsevier BV},
	doi = {10.2139/ssrn.2617208},
	author = {Verplanke, J and Martinez, J and Miscione, G and Georgiadou, Y and Coleman, D and Hassan, AA}
}
@article {richter2010conceptualizingdevelopment,
	title = {Conceptualizing people in SDI literature: Implications for SDI research and development.},
	journal = {Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res.},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {286{\textendash}325},
	author = {Richter, C and Miscione, G and Georgiadou, Y}
}
@inbook {miscione2010acontexts,
	title = {A FEDERATIVE VIEW FOR INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURES IN DEVELOPING CONTEXTS},
	booktitle = {.},
	year = {2010},
	publisher = {.},
	organization = {.},
	address = {.},
	author = {Miscione, G and Georgiadou, Y and Staring, K}
}
@conference {georgiadou2009aperspectives,
	title = {A bigger picture: information systems and spatial data infrastructure research perspectives},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 11th AGILE international conference on geographic information science: Spatial Data Infrastructure Convergence: Building SDI Bridges to Address Global Challenges},
	year = {2009},
	url = {http://www.gsdi.orgwww.gsdi.org/gsdiconf/gsdi11/papers/pdf/266.pdf},
	author = {Georgiadou, Y and Harvey, F and Miscione, G}
}
@article {georgiadou2009framingperspectives,
	title = {Framing the use of geo-information in government: A tale of two perspectives},
	journal = {Earth Science Informatics},
	volume = {2},
	number = {4},
	year = {2009},
	month = {Dec},
	pages = {271{\textendash}282},
	abstract = {While commercial virtual globes (e. g. Google Earth) and global scientific cyber-infrastructures (e. g. Digital Earth) are revolutionizing the way we use and produce geo-information, we still lack a rich conceptual understanding of how genuine human actors use geo-information and associated technologies in real work settings. In this paper, we conceptualize the use of geo-information as encompassing people{\textquoteright}s actual use practices, the values to which people aspire through geo-information use, and the rules that either legally prescribe or just encourage optimal use. Values, practices and rules can be illuminated from two perspectives (or lenses), the market and the polis, resulting in radically different insights on the use of geo-information as a social phenomenon. We argue that with a polis lens we stand a chance to explain how authentic human actors, groups and communities with different values, interests and motivations use geo-information, and how societal benefits materialize or not as a result. Seen from a polis lens, values are not easily measurable standards of goodness, dominant public management ideas can be the source of technical-organizational change in government while policies can be fruitfully examined as persuasive arguments to target audiences. With a polis lens, we are more likely to understand the emergence of new practices, value contests and global rules underpinning commercial virtual globes and scientific cyber-infrastructures. {\textcopyright} Springer-Verlag 2009.},
	issn = {1865-0473},
	doi = {10.1007/s12145-009-0036-5},
	author = {Georgiadou, Y and Miscione, G and Lance, K and de Vries, W}
}
@booklet {georgiadou2009geoictgovernance,
	title = {Geo-ICT in public governance},
	year = {2009},
	month = {Aug},
	author = {Georgiadou, Y and Miscione, G}
}
@conference {kolte2009aindia,
	title = {A Proposal for studying Decision-making and Spatial Data Infrastructures in the Public Sector in India},
	year = {2009},
	author = {Kolte, P and Boerboom, L and Miscione, G and Georgiadou, Y}
}
@conference {richter2008designdevelopment,
	title = {Design of an unbounded ethnography of spatial information infrastructure development},
	year = {2008},
	author = {Richter, C and Miscione, G and Pfeffer, K and Georgiadou, Y}
}
