@article {1356,
	title = {Objects, Metrics and Practices: An Inquiry into the Programmatic Advertising Ecosystem},
	volume = {543},
	year = {2018},
	pages = {110-123},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	address = {San Francisco, CA},
	isbn = {978-3-030-04090-1},
	issn = {1868-4238},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-04091-8_9},
	url = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-04091-8},
	author = {Alaimo, Cristina and Kallinikos, Jannis},
	editor = {Schultze, Ulrike and Aanestad, Margunn and M{\"a}hring, Magnus and {\O}sterlund, Carsten and Riemer, Kai}
}
@booklet {2014opennessnarratives,
	title = {Openness and Surveillance on Global Infrastructures - Whose Narratives?},
	year = {2014},
	month = {Jul}
}
@conference {2014,
	title = {Optimizing Features in Active Machine Learning for Complex Qualitative Content Analysis},
	booktitle = {Workshop on Language Technologies and Computational Social Science, 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics},
	year = {2014},
	month = {06/2014},
	address = {Baltimore, MD},
	abstract = {We propose a semi-automatic approach for content analysis that leverages machine learning (ML) being initially trained on a small set of hand-coded data to perform a first pass in coding, and then have human annotators correct machine annotations in order to produce more examples to retrain the existing model incrementally for better performance. In this {\textquotedblleft}active learning{\textquotedblright} approach, it is equally important to optimize the creation of the initial ML model given less training data so that the model is able to capture most if not all positive examples, and filter out as many negative examples as possible for human annotators to correct. This paper reports our attempt to optimize the initial ML model through feature exploration in a complex content analysis project that uses a multidimensional coding scheme, and contains codes with sparse positive examples. While different codes respond optimally to different combinations of features, we show that it is possible to create an optimal initial ML model using only a single combination of features for codes with at least 100 positive examples in the gold standard corpus.},
	author = {Jasy Liew Suet Yan and McCracken, Nancy and Shichun Zhou and Kevin Crowston}
}
@proceedings {2013,
	title = {Open Source Software Adoption: A Technological Innovation Perspective},
	year = {2013},
	month = {5/2013},
	address = {Lyon, France},
	abstract = {This research-in-progress aims to indentify the salient factors explaining adoption of open source software (OSS), as a technological innovation. The theoretical background of the paper is based on the technological innovation literature. We choose to focus on the open ERP case, as it is considered as a promising innovation for firms {\textendash} especially medium firms - but open ERP also faces numerous challenges. The paper provides a framework and a method for investigation that has to be implemented.},
	keywords = {open source},
	url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2244222},
	author = {Kevin Crowston and Fran{\c c}ois Deltour and Nicolas Jullien}
}
@conference {miscione2013opennessconsequences,
	title = {Openness may not Mean Democratization - e-Grievance Systems in their Consequences},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {University of Twente},
	organization = {University of Twente},
	address = {Enschede},
	author = {Miscione, G and Pfeffer, K and Martinez, J and De{\textquoteright}, R}
}
@booklet {hayesoverflowsmpesa,
	title = {Overflows of Technological Innovation in Emerging Economies: The Case of M-Pesa},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {Elsevier BV},
	doi = {10.2139/ssrn.2617305},
	author = {Hayes, N and Miscione, G and Westrup, C}
}
@article {hayes2013overflows,
	title = {Overflows of Technological Innovation in Emerging Economies: The Case of M-Pesa},
	journal = {Available at SSRN 2617305},
	year = {2013},
	author = {Niall Hayes and Miscione, Gianluca and Chris Westrup}
}
@article {miscioneopenness,
	title = {OPENNESS MAY NOT MEAN DEMOCRATIZATION},
	year = {2012},
	author = {Miscione, G and Pfeffer, K and Martinez, J and De, R}
}
@article {519,
	title = {Open sourcing regulation: the development of the Creative Commons licences as a form of commons based peer production},
	year = {2010},
	url = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46277557_Open_sourcing_regulation_the_development_of_the_Creative_Commons_licences_as_a_form_of_commons_based_peer_production},
	author = {Prodromos Tsiavos and Edgar A. Whitley}
}
@article {IFIP AICT03180348,
	title = {Opening up the Agile Innovation Process},
	volume = {318},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {348{\textendash}349},
	publisher = {Springer},
	isbn = {978-3-642-12112-8},
	author = {Conboy, Kieran and Brian Donnellan and Lorraine Morgan and Wang, Xiaofeng},
	editor = {Jan Pries-Heje and Venable, John and Deborah Bunker and Nancy L. Russo and Janice I. DeGross}
}
@inbook {440,
	title = {Object lessons and invisible technologies},
	booktitle = {Bricolage, Care and Information Systems},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {Forthcoming},
	publisher = {Palgrave},
	organization = {Palgrave},
	address = {Basingstoke},
	author = {Edgar A. Whitley and Mary L Darking},
	editor = {Chrisanthi Avgerou and Willcocks, Leslie and Giovan Francesc Lanzara}
}
@article {588,
	title = {Open Access Publishing to Nurture the Sprouts of Knowledge and the Future of Information Systems Research},
	journal = {Communications of the Association for Information Systems},
	volume = {24},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {509-522},
	keywords = {academic journals, ePrints, mass collaboration, online repositories, Open Access, scholarly publishing, Sprouts, working papers},
	url = {http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol24/iss1/30/},
	author = {Lyytinen, K and Majchrzak, Ann and Avital, M and Bj{\"o}rk, B-C and Boland, R and Kevin Crowston}
}
@booklet {miscione2009openeconomics,
	title = {Open Source Development and Innovation (London School of Economics)},
	year = {2009},
	month = {Apr},
	author = {Miscione, G}
}
@article {774,
	title = {Organizational Learning in Health Care: Situating Free and Open Source Software},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008},
	pages = {372 - 373},
	abstract = {Free and open source software (FOSS) has been attracting the interest of organizations involved in the development and implementation of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in developing countries foryears. ICTs for development initiatives often
 have public sector orientations, as governments{\textquoteright} ICT policies are expected to shape and support socio-economical development.
 The usual mismatch between formal bureaucracies{\textquoteright} functioning, the usual top-down software development schemes, and the actual
 trajectories of development initiatives (mostly run by international agencies) provides a promising empirical field. This paper intends to discuss the connection between FOSS and organizational learning in contexts where the usual assumptions about them cannot be taken for granted. It is argued that the relevance of open technologies
 as public goods is in allowing organizational learning in public administration. Such a focus on the organizational aspects
 would complement existing studies on the economical relevance of FOSS.
 The argument is built by addressing FOSS-related emphatic expectations for emancipation in the {\textquotedblleft}knowledge society{\textquotedblright} on one
 side (Government of Kerala 2002), and implementation and use, on the other. Then, a meso-level between global trends and local
 specificities is identified as crucial in situating FOSS for development potentialities. Empirically, this level is between
 the two usual poles in information systems studies: decision makers (public administrators and software developers, both oriented
 by a top-down approach to systems design) and the ground of implementation (usually sensitive to a variety of contexts). As
 it is unusual in developing contexts to have spontaneous voluntary participation, the software development process needs to
 be designed and carried out in a way that allows local organizations to {\textquotedblleft}indigenize{\textquotedblright} FOSS.1 Its fluidity allows inscribing a variety of context-bound socio-technical arrangements (De Laet and Mol 2000), and also can
 cause avoidance of path-dependencies and vendor lock-ins (Weerawarana and Weeratunge 2004).
 The case of a health information system being implemented in Kerala, as part of an international initiative, is presented.
 We describe, on one side, the principles and views supporting the network and local politics and, on the other side, aspects
 of the implementation dynamic, which is underestimated in the common approach to ICT for development (Avgerou 2007).
 The project presented in the paper has significant links both at the global level (participating in a broad and heterogeneous
 network of trend-setting organizations like universities and research centers, international donors, ministries of different
 countries) and local levels (where systems are piloted and implemented, capacity building is carried out, requirements for
 further developments are collected). Empirical exploration showed that the (formal and informal) institutional constraints,
 which FOSS implies and relies on, are fragmented or absent, whereas others can be relevant. Nevertheless, FOSS narrative proves to be present and effective both in negotiations between stakeholders, and in facilitating local participation
 to information system development.2
 The meso-level position of this initiative shows the distance between the two ends, descriptively. Prescriptively, it suggests
 how possible bridges can allow interorganizational relations across a variety of actors rarely involved in the same FOSS initiative.
 The interactions around local technical skills improvement and the increased ability for organizations to formulate, express, negotiate, and inscribe their needs in technology is proposed
 as a chance for organizational learning. In contexts of multiple accountabilities (Suchman 2002), we claim that the relevance of FOSS emerges from negotiating alliances, and does not inhere in FOSS itself. FOSS facilitates learning as far as its openness is allowed by software development
 processes, and enacted by brokering activities to relate dispersed practices (Gherardi and Nicolini 2002).
},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09768-8_31},
	author = {Miscione, Gianluca and Margunn Aanestad}
}
@inbook {miscione2008organizationalsoftware,
	title = {Organizational learning in health care: Situating free and open source software},
	volume = {267},
	year = {2008},
	month = {Jan},
	pages = {372{\textendash}373},
	abstract = {Free and open source software (FOSS) has been attracting the interest of organizations involved in the development and implementation of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in developing countries for years. ICTs for development initiatives often have public sector orientations, as governments{\textquoteright} ICT policies are expected to shape and support socio-economical development. The usual mismatch between formal bureaucracies{\textquoteright} functioning, the usual top-down software development schemes, and the actual trajectories of development initiatives (mostly run by international agencies) provides a promising empirical field. This paper intends to discuss the connection between FOSS and organizational learning in contexts where the usual assumptions about them cannot be taken for granted. It is argued that the relevance of open technologies as public goods is in allowing organizational learning in public administration. Such a focus on the organizational aspects would complement existing studies on the economical relevance of FOSS. {\textcopyright} 2008 by International Federation for Information Processing.},
	isbn = {9780387097671},
	issn = {1868-4238},
	doi = {10.1007/978-0-387-09768-8_31},
	author = {Miscione, G and Aanestad, M}
}
@booklet {344,
	title = {Overcoming Location Boundaries: Telecooperation and Virtual Enterprises},
	howpublished = {Information, Organization and Management},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008///},
	pages = {317 - 367},
	abstract = {Large areas of business applications are increasingly contradicting the traditional picture of the enterprise as an integrated, methodically organized, and relatively stable product of the production of tangible assets and services: Strict hierarchies dissolve themselves into flat, modular structures (chapter 5). Traditional organizational boundaries blur in symbiotic, network-like entrepreneurial relationships (chapter 6). Technical infrastructures revolutionize markets (chapter 7) through the step-wise dissolution of spatial and temporal restriction. The increasing dissolution of locations, as well as the conditions for and implications of this for actual and future organizational forms, is the focal point of this chapter. Virtual organizations are an outgrowth of these developments. They therefore function more like spider-webs than networks. They are opposites of organizations that, with regard to ownership and contracts, have relatively well-defined boundaries, have a steady location, relatively permanent resource assignments, and controlled process structures. According to Aristotelian philosophy, virtuality may be regarded as an idealized goal of a boundless organization (Legrand 1972, p. 269). It may also be regarded as an organizational form that considers virtuality in the same sense as information systems researchers might, i.e. as a concept of performance improvement. This perspective also regards concrete locations where the actual work is carried out as systematic and dynamic (Mowshowitz 1991; Szyperski / Klein 1993). We will next address fundamental aspects of the dissolution of the work location, as well as questions pertaining to the drivers and organizational manifestations of dispersed work locations. The virtual organization as a specific result of telecooperative work forms is presented later.},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71395-1_8},
	author = {Picot, Arnold and Reichwald, Ralf and Wigand, Rolf}
}
@inbook {858,
	title = {OASIS in the Mirror: Reflections on the Impacts and Research of IFIP WG 8.2},
	booktitle = {IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Volume 214, The Past and Future of Information Systems: 1976-2006 and Beyond},
	year = {2006},
	note = {WCC Santiago, Chile},
	pages = {63-66},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	address = {New York},
	author = {Kenneth E. Kendall and Avison, David and Davis, Gordon and Julie E. Kendall and Land, Frank and Michael D. Myers},
	editor = {Avison, David and Elliot, Steve and Krogstie, John and Jan Pries-Heje}
}
@article {527,
	title = {Object lessons and invisible technologies},
	journal = {Journal of information technology},
	volume = {21},
	number = {3},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {176-184},
	isbn = {0268-3962},
	url = {JIT2006.pdf},
	author = {Edgar A. Whitley and Mary L Darking}
}
@booklet {miscione2006openscience,
	title = {Open Philosophies for Associative Autopoietic Digital Ecosystems: Community Networks and Digital Ecosystems - Sociological Aspects (London School of Economics and Political Science)},
	year = {2006},
	month = {Jun},
	author = {Miscione, G}
}
@article {miscione2006open,
	title = {Open philosophies for associative autopoietic digital ecosystems: community networks and digital ecosystems-sociological Aspects: powerpoint},
	year = {2006},
	author = {Miscione, G}
}
@article {DBLP:journals/jikm/SrinivasA06,
	title = {Optimising the Heuristics in Latent Semantic Indexing for Effective Information Retrieval},
	journal = {JIKM},
	volume = {5},
	number = {2},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {97-105},
	author = {Srinivas, S. and Kumar, Ch. Aswani}
}
@article {291,
	title = {Ordinary Innovation of Mobile Services},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {305 - 319},
	abstract = {The anabolic growth of dot.com{\textemdash}with third-generation network license auctions as the grand finale{\textemdash}implied a series of large investments in mobile technology. Without new products and services utilizing this infrastructure (m-services), however, these investments may never be recouped, and today there is no sure sign of demand for these new nomadic applications in the market. This paper shows how actors in the m-services value network coordinate their efforts to bring such applications to the marketplace. It shows their risk averse and locally optimizing strategies, which theoretically are very different from the current fascination in Information Systems with disruptive innovation. This paper illustrates the need for a theory of ordinary innovation in nomadic and ubiquitous computing.},
	doi = {10.1007/0-387-28918-6_23},
	author = {Kristoffersen, Steinar and Nielsen, Petter and Blechar, Jennifer and Ole Hanseth}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/FellerFLB03,
	title = {Open Source and Free Software: Organizational and Societal Implications},
	year = {2003},
	pages = {461-464},
	author = {Joseph Feller and Brian Fitzgerald and Jan Ljungberg and Magnus Bergquist}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/EstevesPC03,
	title = {Organizational and National Issues of an ERP Implementation in a Portuguese Company},
	year = {2003},
	pages = {139-153},
	author = {Jos{\'e} Esteves and Joan Antoni Pastor and Jo{\~a}o Carvalho}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/Wastell02,
	title = {Organizational Discourse as a Social Defense: Taming the Tiger of Electronic Government},
	year = {2002},
	pages = {179-195},
	author = {David Graham Wastell}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/RehbinderLLBN01,
	title = {Observations from a Field Study on Developing a Framework for Pre-Usage Evaluation of CASE Tools},
	year = {2001},
	pages = {211-220},
	author = {Adam Rehbinder and Brian Lings and Bj{\"o}rn Lundell and Runo Burman and Anette Nilsson}
}
@article {343,
	title = {Our moral condition in cyberspace},
	journal = {Ethics and Information Technology},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2000},
	month = {2000/09/01/},
	pages = {147 - 152},
	abstract = {Some kinds of technological change not only trigger new ethical problems, but also give rise to questions about those very approaches to addressing ethical problems that have been relied upon in the past. Writing in the aftermath of World War II, Hans Jonas called for a new {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}ethics of responsibility,{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} based on the reasoning that modern technology dramatically divorces our moral condition from the assumptions under which standard ethical theories were first conceived. Can a similar claim be made about the technologies of cyberspace? Do online information technologies so alter our moral condition that standard ethical theories become ineffective in helping us address the moral problems they create? I approach this question from two angles. First, I look at the impact of online information technologies on our powers of causal efficacy. I then go on to consider their impact on self-identity. We have good reasons, I suggest, to be skeptical of any claim that there is a need for a new, cyberspace ethics to address the moral dilemmas arising from these technologies. I conclude by giving a brief sketch of why this suggestion does not imply there is nothing philosophically interesting about the ethical challenges associated with cyberspace.},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010049320893},
	author = {Michelfelder, Diane P.}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/ODonovan99,
	title = {Organizational Disposition and Its Influence on the Adoption and Diffusion of Information Systems},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {155-174},
	author = {Brian O{\textquoteright}Donovan}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/Little93,
	title = {The Organizational Context of Systems Development},
	year = {1993},
	pages = {439-454},
	author = {S. E. Little}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/Heiskanen93,
	title = {Organizational Metaphors and Information Systems Practice: A Case Example of Implementation Strategy Formulation},
	year = {1993},
	pages = {399-417},
	author = {Ari Heiskanen}
}
