@conference {miscione2019hanseatictechnology,
	title = {Hanseatic Governance: Understanding Blockchain as Organizational Technology},
	year = {2019},
	month = {Sep},
	abstract = {Blockchain technology provides a distributed ledger and is based on a logic of peer to peer authentication. It gained prominence with the rise of cryptocurrencies but provides a much broader field of possible applications. While it has been originally closely linked to a libertarian agenda rejecting organizations, its developments have illustrated that this ideological framing is being reversed in practice. Based on contrastive empirical cases, the purpose of our paper is to discuss blockchain as an organizational technology. Its peculiar mode of governance, which we name {\textquoteleft}Hanseatic{\textquoteright}, needs to mediate between the fluidity typical of Free and Open Source Software development and the immutability that use organizations adopt blockchain for.},
	author = {Miscione, G and Klein, S and Schwabe, G and Goerke, T and Ziolkowski, R}
}
@article {1355,
	title = {Hotspots and Blind Spots},
	volume = {543},
	year = {2018},
	pages = {96-109},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	address = {San Francisco, CA},
	isbn = {978-3-030-04090-1},
	issn = {1868-4238},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-04091-8_8},
	url = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-04091-8},
	author = {Waardenburg, Lauren and Sergeeva, Anastasia and Huysman, Marleen},
	editor = {Schultze, Ulrike and Aanestad, Margunn and M{\"a}hring, Magnus and {\O}sterlund, Carsten and Riemer, Kai}
}
@booklet {miscione2015howprospects,
	title = {How come geographic information systems are peripheral in information systems research? Problems and prospects},
	year = {2015},
	month = {Jun},
	publisher = {M{\"u}nster University, Germany},
	author = {Miscione, G}
}
@booklet {2010h20webs,
	title = {H2.0 Inform and Empower Initiative - HSW Final Report: Empowering Communities in East Africa in Water Service Provision through Information from Human Sensor Webs},
	year = {2010},
	month = {Jan},
	publisher = {New York Geneva}
}
@article {miscione2009hegemonies,
	title = {Hegemonies in classification: an introduction},
	year = {2009},
	publisher = {Research Committee 25 of the International Sociological Association},
	author = {Miscione, Gianluca and Landert, Daniela}
}
@article {miscione2009hegemoniesprocesses,
	title = {Hegemonies in Classification Processes},
	journal = {Special Issue of the International Sociological Association publication, Research Committee on Language and Society},
	volume = {6},
	number = {2},
	year = {2009},
	author = {Miscione, G and Landert, D}
}
@article {miscione2009hegemonies,
	title = {Hegemonies in classification processes: introduction},
	journal = {In: ISA-RC 25 Newsletter: Language and Society},
	year = {2009},
	author = {Miscione, G and Landert, D}
}
@article {799,
	title = {How and Why Do IT Entrepreneurs Leave Their Salaried Employment to Start a SME? A Mixed Methods Research Design},
	volume = {301/2009},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {273 - 286},
	publisher = {Springer},
	chapter = {19},
	abstract = {This method paper addresses an untapped but important type of IT turnover: IT entrepreneurship. We seek to develop a mixed methods research (MMR) design to understand the factors and processes that influence turnover behavior of prospective (nascent) IT entrepreneurs. To do this, we review two prior streams of research: the entrepreneurship literature and IT employee turnover. We incorporate the results of this literature review into a conceptual framework describing how the relevant factors leading to entrepreneurial and turnover behavior change over time, either gradually or suddenly, in response to specific events. In addition, we also contribute to the research by arguing that mixed methods research (MMR) is appropriate to bridge the gap between entrepreneurial literature and the IT turnover literature. A third important contribution is the design of the MMR, combining a longitudinal approach with a retrospective approach; a qualitative with a quantitative approach and, the exploratory design with the triangulation design [1]. Finally, we discuss practical implications for IT managers and IT entrepreneurs.
},
	issn = {978-3-642-02387-3},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02388-0_19},
	author = {Mourmant, Ga{\"e}tan}
}
@article {768,
	title = {How Information Systems Providers Develop and Manage Expertise and Leverage Their Client Relationships for Competitive Advantage},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008},
	pages = {311 - 319},
	abstract = {Information technology vendors are continuously growing into global service providers. To reap the benefits of the changing global economy and gain a competitive advantage, providers need to see their client relationships as strategic assets and
 leverage them for expertise development and knowledge integration. How do IS service providers absorb knowledge from client
 relationships over multiple projects at multiple levels? How do IS service providers transfer and disseminate knowledge internally
 at and across multiple levels and integrate it to generate value-creating competencies? These questions are investigated in
 a longitudinal qualitative study employing interpretive case-study methods. The case included in the analysis is a 4-year
 IS outsourcing project between a large European bank and one of the largest Asian service providers. Services were delivered
 through a global virtual team, including offshore and onshore locations, and a particular strategy was employed to transfer
 knowledge cross-functionally, integrate this knowledge internally within the organization, and utilize it effectively in the
 global service delivery system. However, our initial analysis of the first interviews reveals that there was a discrepancy
 between the expected and actual performance of the service provider. Accordingly, the knowledge transfer and management processes
 need to be analyzed in more detail. With this research study, we aim at contributing to the domain of IS offshore outsourcing
 and services science as well as to the theory on vendor capabilities and knowledge management.
},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09768-8_22},
	author = {Gregory, Robert and Prifling, Michael}
}
@article {530,
	title = {How international postgraduate students tackle writing assignments: An empirical study},
	journal = {International journal of applied linguistics},
	volume = {156},
	number = {1},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {329-330},
	isbn = {0019-0810},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034443},
	author = {Edgar A. Whitley and Alexander Grous}
}
@article {553,
	title = {Home Office Accounting Report},
	year = {2006},
	url = {http://identityproject.lse.ac.uk/accountingreport.pdf},
	author = {LSE Identity Project,}
}
@article {554,
	title = {Home Office Accounting Report},
	year = {2006},
	month = {March},
	url = {http://identityproject.lse.ac.uk/accountingreport.pdf},
	author = {LSE Identity Project,}
}
@article {684,
	title = {How (Can) Nonusers Engage with Technology: Bringing in the Digitally Excluded},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {347 - 364},
	abstract = {This paper describes findings from the Penceil Project, which aims to explore the experiences of nonusers and minimal users of ICTs, how nonuse affects their inclusion or exclusion from society, and how they can learn to use ICTs to meet their personal
 goals. The paper considers the applicability of the technology adoption model (TAM) to understanding the experiences of this
 group of people. By looking at theories of social exclusion and the project research findings, the paper argues that TAM is
 limited in the range of social conditions it anticipates and, thus, presumes a facility in formulating aspirations for use
 that people excluded from the use of ICTs cannot have. We argue that we need to consider engagement with technology rather
 than just adoption. We consider the implications of these findings for designing a revised basic ICT curriculum and describe
 the piloting of a new curriculum. We argue that, as ICTs in general{\textemdash}and Internet use in particular{\textemdash}are experienced technologies,
 perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use need to be reformulated to recognize limitations on people{\textquoteright}s ability to construct
 plans for future action since an actor{\textquoteright}s world is disclosed through action not given in advance.
},
	doi = {10.1007/0-387-34588-4_23},
	author = {Cushman, Mike and Klecun, Ela}
}
@conference {2004healthamazon,
	title = {Health Development and Information and Communication Technologies in High Amazon},
	year = {2004},
	month = {Jun}
}
@inbook {895,
	title = {Hermeneutics in Information Systems Research},
	booktitle = {Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {103-128},
	publisher = {John Wiley \& Sons},
	organization = {John Wiley \& Sons},
	address = {Chichester},
	author = {Michael D. Myers},
	editor = {Mingers, John and Leslie P. Willcocks}
}
@article {243,
	title = {How Stakeholder Analysis can be Mobilized with Actor-Network Theory to Identify Actors},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004},
	pages = {705 - 711},
	abstract = {Actor-network theory studies provide detailed accounts of how human and nonhuman actors gradually form stable actor networks. However, due to their focus on a particular context, there is little generic guidance on how such relevant actors can be identified when a different research context is under study. The principles of (human) stakeholder behavior presented in this paper guide the identification of human stakeholders through an iterative, interpretive, dynamic and context-contingent process. We show how they can be adopted and extended to include the identification of nonhuman actants as well. Thus, we argue that they can be instrumental in providing a generic, context-free guidance to stakeholder identification that is currently missing from ANT studies.},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_48},
	author = {Pouloudi, A. and Gandecha, R. and Atkinson, C. and Papazafeiropoulou, A.}
}
@inbook {829,
	title = {Have you got anything to declare? Neo-colonialism, Information Systems, and the imposition of  customs and duties in a Third World Country},
	booktitle = {IS Perspectives and Challenges in the Context of Globalization},
	year = {2003},
	note = {IFIP Joint WG 8.2 and 9.4 Conference, 15-17 June 2003, Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece},
	pages = {101-115},
	publisher = {Kluwer Academic Publishers},
	organization = {Kluwer Academic Publishers},
	address = {Boston},
	keywords = {IFIP, conference, colonialism, neo-colonialism},
	author = {Mariyam S. Adam and Michael D. Myers},
	editor = {Mikko Korpela and Ramiro Montealegre and Angeliki Poulymenakou}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/AdamM03,
	title = {Have You Got Anything to Declare? Neo-Colonialism, Information Systems, and the Imposition of Customs and Duties in a Third World Country},
	year = {2003},
	pages = {101-115},
	author = {Mariyam S. Adam and Michael D. Myers}
}
@article {miscione2000hack3rz,
	title = {hAcK3rZ and Information Warfare},
	year = {2000},
	publisher = {Rosenberg and Sellier},
	author = {Miscione, Gianluca}
}
@article {miscione2000hack3rzwarfare,
	title = {hAcK3rZ e information warfare},
	journal = {Quaderni di Sociologia},
	number = {23},
	year = {2000},
	month = {Aug},
	pages = {22{\textendash}47},
	publisher = {OpenEdition},
	issn = {0033-4952},
	doi = {10.4000/qds.1359},
	author = {Miscione, G}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/BraaR00,
	title = {Horizontal Information Systems: Emergent Trends and Perspectives},
	year = {2000},
	pages = {83-102},
	author = {Kristin Braa and Knut H. Rolland}
}
@proceedings {474,
	title = {Habermas and the non-humans: Towards a critical theory for the new collective},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {83},
	publisher = {http://www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/ejrot/cmsconference/documents/Information\%20Tech/Habermas\%20and\%20the\%20non-humans.pdf},
	address = {Manchester},
	url = {CMS1999.pdf},
	author = {Edgar A. Whitley},
	editor = {Hugh Willmott and Irena Grugulis}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/SarkerL99,
	title = {A Hermeneutic Interpretation of the Effect of Computerized BPR Tools on Redesign Effectiveness in Two Organizations},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {197-218},
	author = {Suprateek Sarker and Allen S. Lee}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/HansethB99,
	title = {Hunting for the Treasure at the End of the Rainbow: Standardizing Corporate IT Infrastructure},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {121-140},
	author = {Ole Hanseth and Kristin Braa}
}
@article {916,
	title = {Hidden Agendas, Power, and Managerial Assumptions in Information Systems Development: An Ethnographic Study},
	journal = {Information Technology \& People},
	volume = {10},
	number = {3},
	year = {1997},
	pages = {224-240},
	keywords = {Habermas, critical social theory, lifeworld},
	author = {Myers, Michael David and Young, Leslie W}
}
@article {547,
	title = {How do you make a deal when you can{\textquoteright}t shake hands?},
	volume = {1},
	number = {2},
	year = {1996},
	month = {June},
	pages = {32,34},
	isbn = {1363-979X},
	author = {Edgar A. Whitley and Lucas D. Introna}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/WillcocksL93,
	title = {How Do Organizations Evaluate and Control Information Systems Investments? Recent UK Survey Evidence},
	year = {1993},
	pages = {15-39},
	author = {Leslie P. Willcocks and Stephanie Lester}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/KerolaO92,
	title = {Hypertext System as an Intermediary Agent in Case Environments},
	year = {1992},
	pages = {289-313},
	author = {Pentti Kerola and Harri Oinas-Kukkonen}
}
