@conference {1533,
	title = {Call for Papers: Criticality and Values in Digital Transformation Research},
	booktitle = {IFIP 8.2 pre-ICIS OASIS Workshop 2022},
	year = {2022},
	publisher = {IFIP Working Group 8.2},
	organization = {IFIP Working Group 8.2},
	address = {Copenhagen, Denmark},
	abstract = {The OASIS pre-ICIS 2022 workshop calls for submissions that take a value-reflective and critical stance on digital transformation. While researchers have paid great attention to understanding how digital transformation can uphold and better the status-quo, there is an emerging awareness of negative consequences and new socioeconomic challenges triggered by digital technologies. Indeed, we face a multitude of societal and organizational issues that digital technologies have the potential to amplify or alleviate; depending on which values we value. The ubiquity of computing blurs boundaries between work and life. Always-on engenders a contorted reality of self and others, yet it also enables flexibility and autonomy. Artificial intelligence (AI) can fuel discrimination, undermine freedom of speech or disassemble entire democracies, while it can also drive progress in society and economy for instance, by helping people with disabilities, optimizing energy generation and consumption, or supporting the development of new drugs. All too often, digital technologies are built on the principle of privacy violation rather than of privacy as a basic human right, and security is used as an argument for enhanced surveillance and control rather than for human wellbeing and protection in the digital sphere. At the same time, we have to tackle social and environmental sustainability issues such as climate change, poverty and inequality in which digital technologies can take a positive role. All this calls for a value-reflective stance and exploration of the criticality of digital transformation. After all, we must acknowledge that any attempt to leverage technology for good can also have negative corollary effects. Hence, the OASIS pre-ICIS 2022 workshop aims to promote research that engages and reflects the value positions and criticality in digital transformation research. We propose an inclusive agenda embracing the more traditional IFIP 8.2 community while being open towards other relevant topics outside IFIP 8.2.},
	keywords = {Criticality, Digital transformation, Information infrastructure, Responsible Artificial Intelligence, values},
	author = {Markus P. Zimmer and Polyxeni Vasilakopoulou and Miria Grisot and Marko Niemimaa}
}
@conference {1535,
	title = {Digital Transformations in Non-Governmental Organizations {\textendash} A Case Study on the Effect of Power Imbalances},
	booktitle = {IFIP 8.2 pre-ICIS OASIS Workshop 2022},
	year = {2022},
	publisher = {IFIP Working Group 8.2},
	organization = {IFIP Working Group 8.2},
	address = {Copenhagen, Denmark},
	author = {Marie E. Godefroid and Ralf Plattfaut and Bj{\"o}rn Niehaves}
}
@conference {miscioneac2016multinationaltiers,
	title = {Multinational and Indigenous IT Companies in Ireland: Exploring the Spatial Relationships between the Two Tiers},
	year = {2016},
	month = {Dec},
	author = {Miscioneac, G and Carrolla, P and Dekkerb, S and Nedovic-Budicbc, Z and Shahumyanbd, H and Dublin, B}
}
@article {1167,
	title = {Materiality, Health Informatics and the Limits of Knowledge Production},
	volume = {446},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {132-148},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	keywords = {critical analysis, health informatics, knowledge production, materiality},
	isbn = {978-3-662-45707-8},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-662-45708-5_9},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45708-5_9},
	author = {Robertson, Hamish and Nicholas, Nick and Rosenfeld, Tuly and Travaglia, JoanneF.},
	editor = {Doolin, Bill and Lamprou, Eleni and Mitev, Nathalie and McLeod, Laurie}
}
@article {2012,
	title = {The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms},
	journal = {Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2012},
	month = {08/2012},
	pages = {298{\textendash}304},
	abstract = {Citizen science creates a nexus between science and education that, when coupled with emerging technologies, expands the frontiers of ecological research and public engagement. Using representative technologies and other examples, we examine the future of citizen science in terms of its research processes, program and participant cultures, and scientific communities. Future citizen-science projects will likely be influenced by sociocultural issues related to new technologies and will continue to face practical programmatic challenges. We foresee networked, open science and the use of online computer/video gaming as important tools to engage non-traditional audiences, and offer recommendations to help prepare project managers for impending challenges. A more formalized citizen-science enterprise, complete with networked organizations, associations, journals, and cyberinfrastructure, will advance scientific research, including ecology, and further public education.},
	issn = {1540-9295},
	doi = {10.1890/110294},
	url = {http://www.esajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1890/110294},
	author = {Newman, Greg and Wiggins, Andrea and Crall, Alycia and Graham, Eric and Newman, Sarah and Kevin Crowston}
}
@inbook {1201,
	title = {The design {\textendash} reality gap: The impact of stakeholder strategies on IS implementation in developing countries},
	booktitle = {Governance and Sustainability in Information Systems. Managing the Transfer and Diffusion of IT},
	series = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communications Technology},
	volume = {366},
	year = {2011},
	note = {IFIP WG 8.6 International Working Conference, Hamburg, Germany, September 22-24, 2011.},
	pages = {119-134},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	type = {Book Section},
	address = {New York},
	author = {Vaidya, Ranjan and Michael D. Myers and Gardner, Lesley},
	editor = {N{\"u}ttgens, Markus and Gadatsch, Andreas and Karlheinz Kautz and Schirmer, Ingrid and Blinn, Nadine}
}
@article {1060,
	title = {From Forestry Machines to Sociotechnical Hybrids: Investigating the Use of Digitally Enabled Forestry Machines},
	volume = {356},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {199-214},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	keywords = {forestry industry, materiality, Open innovation, value constellations},
	isbn = {978-3-642-21363-2},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-21364-9_13},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21364-9_13},
	author = {Nyl{\'e}n, Daniel and Holmstr{\"o}m, Jonny},
	editor = {Chiasson, Mike and Ola Henfridsson and Helena Karsten and DeGross, JaniceI.}
}
@conference {2011,
	title = {Mechanisms for Data Quality and Validation in Citizen Science},
	booktitle = {"Computing for Citizen Science" workshop at the IEEE eScience Conference},
	year = {2011},
	month = {12/2011},
	address = {Stockholm, Sweden},
	abstract = {Data quality is a primary concern for researchers employing public participation in scientific research, or {\textquotedblleft}citizen science,{\textquotedblright} to accomplish data collection and analysis tasks. This mode of scientific collaboration relies on contributions from a large, often unknown population of volunteers with widely variable expertise. In this paper, we review the commonly employed mechanisms for ensuring data quality. We also discuss results of a survey of citizen science projects that reports on the use of some of these mechanisms, noting that it is most common for projects to employ multiple mechanisms to ensure data quality and appropriate levels of validation.},
	keywords = {Citizen Science, data quality, data validation},
	url = {http://itee.uq.edu.au/~eresearch/workshops/compcitsci2011/index.html},
	author = {Wiggins, Andrea and Newman, Greg and Stevenson, Robert D. and Kevin Crowston}
}
@article {IFIP AICT03180346,
	title = {The Role of Public Policy in Enhancing the Design and Diffusion of Information Systems and Technology for Human Benefit},
	volume = {318},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {346{\textendash}347},
	publisher = {Springer},
	isbn = {978-3-642-12112-8},
	author = {Venable, John and Peter Newman and Nick Letch and Sue Ash},
	editor = {Jan Pries-Heje and Venable, John and Deborah Bunker and Nancy L. Russo and Janice I. DeGross}
}
@article {795,
	title = {An Examination of the Disruptive Innovation Paradox: The Application of the Innovators Dilemma to SME{\textquoteright}s},
	volume = {301/2009},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {60 - 72},
	publisher = {Springer},
	chapter = {5},
	abstract = {Managing strategic contradiction and paradoxical situations has been gaining importance in technological, innovation and management domains. As a result, more and more paradoxical instances and types have been documented in literature. The innovators dilemma is such an instance that gives a detailed description of how disruptive innovations affect firms. However, the innovators dilemma has only been applied to large organisations and more specifically industry incumbents. Through a multiple case study of six eLearning SME{\textquoteright}s, this paper investigates the applicability of the innovators dilemma as well as the disruptive effects of Web 2.0 on the organisations. Analysing the data collected over 18 months, it was found that the innovators dilemma did indeed apply to SME{\textquoteright}s. However, inline with the original thesis the dilemma only applied to the SME{\textquoteright}s established (pre-2002) before the development of Web 2.0 technologies began. Furthermore, the study highlights that the post-2002 firms were also partly vulnerable to the dilemma but were able to avoid any negative effects though technological visionary leadership. In contrast, the pre-2002 firms were lacking this visionary ability and were also constrained by low risk profiles.
},
	issn = {978-3-642-02387-3},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02388-0_5},
	author = {Nagle, Tadhg and Golden, William}
}
@inbook {439,
	title = {Perceptions of government technology, surveillance and privacy: the UK identity cards scheme},
	booktitle = {New Directions in Privacy and Surveillance},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {133-156},
	publisher = {Willan},
	organization = {Willan},
	address = {Cullompton},
	isbn = {978-1-84392-363-3},
	url = {Willan2009.pdf},
	author = {Edgar A. Whitley},
	editor = {Daniel Neyland and Benjamin Goold}
}
@article {773,
	title = {Mind the Gap! Understanding Knowledge in Global Software Teams},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008},
	pages = {321 - 330},
	abstract = {This paper presents a conceptual framework and preliminary empirical analysis of knowledge gaps between global software team members in the UK and India. Drawing on episodes from rich case study evidence of a UK software firm based in the UK and software
 development sites in India, the conceptual framework is used to explore the data and to understand the knowledge gaps encountered.
 These are in relation to the level of knowledge, educational background, and experience of members. This study unpacks the
 notion of knowledge of software development into domain, technical, and application knowledge and considers the implications
 of prior knowledge, experience, and education background. It is anticipated from the preliminary findings that a practical
 and theoretical contribution will improve our understanding of the complexities of knowledge in such global arrangements.
},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09768-8_23},
	author = {Aini Aman and Brian Nicholson}
}
@article {782,
	title = {The Servicitization of Peer Production: Reflections on the Open Source Software Experience},
	year = {2008},
	month = {2008},
	pages = {353 - 355},
	abstract = {The concept of what Yochai Benkler called {\textquotedblleft}peer production{\textquotedblright} as an alternative mechanism to traditional hierarchies and markets has captured the imagination of numerous communities in contexts ranging from t-shirt design to software to gold mining. While
 some question the suitability and potential longevity of this mode of production, others are focused on determining ways in
 which peer-produced products and services can be suitably packaged to meet the requirements of consumers. In particular, the
 mature peer production phenomenon known as open source software has emerged as a credible alternative to its proprietary counterpart
 and presents a compelling challenge to both industry and academia as we seek to understand how firms and other organizations
 can build sustainable business models leveraging the public commons of open source products and the collaborative engine that
 created them.
},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09768-8_27},
	author = {Joseph Feller and Finnegan, Patrick and Bj{\"o}rn Lundell and Nilsson, Olof}
}
@article {320,
	title = {Conceptualizing Virtual Collaborative Work},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {21 - 34},
	abstract = {The purpose of this paper is to define the phenomena associated with virtual collaborative work from both a cognitive and social cognitive perspective. The authors put forth an approach that assumes all people are natural sense-makers, sense-givers and organizers. The authors posit that the collaborative work we observe within both informal (ad hoc teams or communities) and formal (organizational) environments derives from fundamental, ubiquitous cognitive and social behavior intimately tied to context-specific problems or situations. The paper begins by challenging the need to re-define terms like {\textquotedblleft}virtual{\textquotedblright} and {\textquotedblleft}team{\textquotedblright} in a manner which works to subtly shift the focus of study from {\textquotedblleft}proximal vs. distributed{\textquotedblright} to the more fruitful {\textquotedblleft}fundamental behavior vs. technological constraints.{\textquotedblright} The paper then presents a framework for virtual collaborative work and discusses its implications on issues related to teams, leadership, creativity, and the design and use of information technology.},
	doi = {10.1007/978-0-387-73025-7_4},
	author = {D{\textquoteright}Eredita, Michael and Nilan, Michael}
}
@article {356,
	title = {The IT Artifact and Telecommuting},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {391 - 395},
	abstract = {Research on the concept of telecommuting or telework, as it is known in various areas of the world, has appeared in information systems (IS) and non-IS publications for more than 20 years. Research areas with respect to telecommuting are quite varied, from Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) use, to transportation, managerial control, work-life issues, and more. A significant number of these studies have taken into account the role of technology in enabling telecommuting. However, recent awareness of the IT artifact issue [1] has raised concerns for some authors, reviewers, and editors as to when the technology component is significant enough to consider some of the telecommuting research as IS research. Others, meanwhile, believe that by definition telecommuting addresses the IT artifact issue, and that this should not be a concern. In this panel, we explore the question of whether the IT artifact is an issue in IS-related telecommuting research by examining topics from multiple and sometimes competing perspectives.},
	doi = {10.1007/978-0-387-73025-7_30},
	author = {B{\'e}langer, France and Watson-Manheim, Mary and Harrington, Susan and Johnson, Nancy and Neufeld, Derrick}
}
@article {909,
	title = {The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft},
	journal = {Information and Organization},
	volume = {17},
	number = {1},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {2-26},
	author = {Michael D. Myers and Michael Newman}
}
@article {398,
	title = {Structuring Virtuality},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {53 - 66},
	abstract = {The purpose of this paper is to provide an example of an empirical procedure for generating user-based cognitive and social cognitive models of tasks/problems/contexts that can be employed to create readily navigable link structures for virtuality-mediated communication and collaboration purposes. Employing a natural language, user-based method, this study describes patterns found across 128 interviews where respondents were describing their cognitive movement in the form of steps taken during an interactive E-Commerce situation. Employing these patterns, we analytically develop a model of E-Commerce as a series of logically necessary steps over time. The resulting model illustrates the utility of individual cognitive and social cognitive patterns to structure virtuality as a series of interactive links associated with particular tasks/problems/contexts. Logical structures derived in this manner have the additional strength of requiring no {\textquotedblleft}training{\textquotedblright} of users because they already recognize the inherent linguistic, temporal and functional relationships. As an added benefit, the model of E-Commerce generated in this study has concrete practical implications for web site design and evaluation.},
	doi = {10.1007/978-0-387-73025-7_6},
	author = {Nilan, Michael and Mundkur, Anuradha}
}
@booklet {314,
	title = {Base Concepts},
	howpublished = {Virtual Organizations},
	year = {2005},
	month = {2005///},
	pages = {11 - 28},
	abstract = {In literature numerous definitions and characteristics of virtual organizations are available. A large number of research initiatives and industry cases have been developing concepts, methods and enabling IT for virtual organizations. This chapter presents a synopsis of results from more than 60 national, European, and global research projects (including IMS), as well as US research and road-mapping activities (IMTI and FIATECH). The first part describes common definitions, characteristics and core concepts for networks and virtual organisations. In the second part expectations, potentials and management issues in virtual organizations are discussed.},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23757-7_2},
	author = {K{\"u}r{\"u}ml{\"u}oglu, Mehmet and N{\o}stdal, Rita and Karvonen, Iris}
}
@article {289,
	title = {Mobile Systems Development: A Literature Review},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {215 - 232},
	abstract = {This article reviews 105 representative contributions to the literature on mobile systems development. The contributions are categorized according to a simple conceptual framework. The framework comprises four perspectives: the requirements perspective, the technology perspective, the application perspective, and the business perspective. Our literature review shows that mobile systems development is overlooked in the current debate. From the review, we extend the traditional view on systems development to encompass mobile systems and, based on the identified perspectives, we propose core characteristics for mobile systems. We also extend the traditional focus found in systems development on processes in a development project to encompass the whole of the development company as well as interorganizational linkage between development companies. Finally, we point at research directions emerging from the review that are relevant to the field of mobile systems development.},
	doi = {10.1007/0-387-28918-6_17},
	author = {Hosbond, Jens and Nielsen, Peter}
}
@article {291,
	title = {Ordinary Innovation of Mobile Services},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {305 - 319},
	abstract = {The anabolic growth of dot.com{\textemdash}with third-generation network license auctions as the grand finale{\textemdash}implied a series of large investments in mobile technology. Without new products and services utilizing this infrastructure (m-services), however, these investments may never be recouped, and today there is no sure sign of demand for these new nomadic applications in the market. This paper shows how actors in the m-services value network coordinate their efforts to bring such applications to the marketplace. It shows their risk averse and locally optimizing strategies, which theoretically are very different from the current fascination in Information Systems with disruptive innovation. This paper illustrates the need for a theory of ordinary innovation in nomadic and ubiquitous computing.},
	doi = {10.1007/0-387-28918-6_23},
	author = {Kristoffersen, Steinar and Nielsen, Petter and Blechar, Jennifer and Ole Hanseth}
}
@article {229,
	title = {Building Capacity for E-Government: Contradictions and Synergies in the Dialectics of Action Research},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004},
	pages = {651 - 652},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_36},
	author = {Wastell, David and Kawalek, Peter and Newman, Mike and Willetts, Mike and Langmead-Jones, Peter}
}
@article {261,
	title = {Symbolic Processes in ERP Versus Legacy System Usage},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004},
	pages = {713 - 722},
	abstract = {Being hailed as possessing the ability to drive effective business reengineering and management of core and support processes, it is not surprising that enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems have been adopted by more than 60 percent of Fortune 500 companies at the turn of the century. In contrast, legacy systems have frequently been attached with negative connotations. Yet at the same time, it is common knowledge that some legacy systems are not replaced when companies adopt ERP solutions, while new in-house systems still continue to be developed. While risks and time involved have been highlighted as possible reasons for the non-replacement of legacy systems, little attention has been paid to process issues as well as the symbolic meanings attached to the ERP vis-a-vis the other coexisting information systems. This research employs symbolic interactionism as the informing theoretical perspective in an ethnographic study of a large government authority in Singapore. Our findings surprisingly indicate that contrary to popular belief, the end-users in that organization tend to attach rather favorable symbols to their legacy and new in-house developed systems, while displaying relatively negative sentiments towards their ERP package. In this paper, we first discuss the different symbolism attached over the years to the coexisting systems. Next, we highlight how certain symbols gradually got sedimented over time. Finally, we demonstrate how the consequent manifestations of these symbolic realities influenced certain organizational actions that impacted the usage and perpetuation of the coexisting systems.},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_49},
	author = {Ng, Martin and Tan, Michael}
}
@article {539,
	title = {What is it like to do an Information Systems PhD in Europe?  Diversity in the practice of IS research},
	journal = {Communications of the AIS},
	volume = {13},
	number = {21},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {317-335},
	isbn = {1529-3181},
	url = {CAIS2004.pdf},
	author = {Edgar A. Whitley and Sandra Sieber and Cristina C{\'a}liz and Mary L Darking and Chiara Frigerio and Edoardo Jacucci and Anna N{\"o}teberg and Michael Rill}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/ShoibN03,
	title = {Cross-Cultural IS Adoption in Multinational Corporations: A Study of Rationality},
	year = {2003},
	pages = {435-451},
	author = {Gamila Shoib and Joe Nandhakumar}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/CiborraN03,
	title = {Good Governance and Development Aid: Risks and Challenges of E-Government in Jordan},
	year = {2003},
	pages = {387-402},
	author = {Claudio Ciborra and Diego D. Navarra}
}
@proceedings {491,
	title = {Panel: What is it like to do an Information Systems PhD in Europe?  Diversity in the practice of IS research},
	year = {2003},
	address = {Naples, Italy},
	url = {ECIS2003PhD.pdf},
	author = {Edgar A. Whitley and Sandra Sieber and Mary L Darking and Cristina Caliz and Chiara Frigerio and Anna Noteberg},
	editor = {Claudio Ciborra and Ricardo Mercurio and Marco de Marco and Marcello Martinez and Andrea Carignani}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/AmanN03,
	title = {The Process of Offshore Software Development: Preliminary Studies of UK Companies in Malaysia},
	year = {2003},
	pages = {201-216},
	author = {Aini Aman and Brian Nicholson}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/NandhakumarV01,
	title = {Due Process and the Introduction of New Technology: The Institution of Video Teleconferencing},
	year = {2001},
	pages = {127-148},
	author = {Joe Nandhakumar and Richard T. Vidgen}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/GalliersEMN01,
	title = {Knowledge Management Systems: Hype, Hope, or Folly?},
	year = {2001},
	pages = {471-476},
	author = {Robert D. Galliers and Ellen Enkel and Lisa D. Murphy and Sue Newell}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/RehbinderLLBN01,
	title = {Observations from a Field Study on Developing a Framework for Pre-Usage Evaluation of CASE Tools},
	year = {2001},
	pages = {211-220},
	author = {Adam Rehbinder and Brian Lings and Bj{\"o}rn Lundell and Runo Burman and Anette Nilsson}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/NielsenN01,
	title = {Software Process Maturity and Organizational Politics},
	year = {2001},
	pages = {221-240},
	author = {Peter Axel Nielsen and Jacob N{\o}rbjerg}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/SawyerHTN01,
	title = {What Do We Mean by Information Technology? Perspectives on Studying Computing},
	year = {2001},
	pages = {461-466},
	author = {Steve Sawyer and Steven Haynes and Duane P. Truex and Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama}
}
@article {830,
	title = {Action Research},
	journal = {Communications of the ACM},
	volume = {42},
	number = {1},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {94-97},
	author = {Avison, David and Lau, Francis and Myers, Michael David and Nielson, Peter Axel}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/NgwenyamaIM99,
	title = {Building on a Decade of Research on IT and Organizations},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {1-10},
	author = {Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama and Lucas D. Introna and Michael D. Myers}
}
@inbook {918,
	title = {Building on a Decade of Research on IT and Organizations},
	booktitle = {New Information Technologies in Organizational Processes: Field Studies and Theoretical Reflections on the Future of Work},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {1-7},
	publisher = {Kluwer Academic Publishers},
	organization = {Kluwer Academic Publishers},
	address = {Norwell, MA},
	keywords = {IFIP 8.2},
	author = {Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama and Lucas D. Introna and Michael D. Myers},
	editor = {Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama and Lucas D. Introna and Michael D. Myers and Janice I. DeGross}
}
@booklet {919,
	title = {New Information Technologies in Organizational Processes: Field Studies and Theoretical Reflections on the Future of Work},
	year = {1999},
	publisher = {Kluwer Academic Publishers},
	address = {Norwell, MA},
	keywords = {IFIP 8.2},
	author = {Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama and Lucas D. Introna and Michael D. Myers and Janice I. DeGross}
}
@proceedings {473,
	title = {Method-ism in practice: Investigating the relationship between method and understanding in web page design},
	year = {1998},
	pages = {68-75},
	publisher = {ICIS},
	address = {Helsinki, Finland},
	url = {ICIS1998.pdf},
	author = {Edgar A. Whitley},
	editor = {Rudy Hirschheim and Michael Newman and Janice I. De Gross}
}
@proceedings {917,
	title = {Ethnographic Research in Information Systems: An Exploration of Three Alternative Approaches to Ethnography},
	year = {1997},
	month = {14-17 December 1},
	address = {Atlanta, Georgia},
	author = {Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama and Harvey, Lynda and Michael D. Myers and Eleanor Wynn}
}
@inbook {837,
	title = {The Impact of Action Research on Information Systems},
	booktitle = {Information Systems and Qualitative Research},
	year = {1997},
	publisher = {Chapman and Hall},
	organization = {Chapman and Hall},
	address = {London},
	author = {Richard Baskerville and Michael D. Myers and Nielson, Peter Axel and Trevor Wood-Harper},
	editor = {Allen S. Lee and Jonathan Liebenau and Janice I. DeGross}
}
@article {278899,
	title = {Panel{\textendash}-assessing critical social theory research in information systems},
	year = {1997},
	pages = {119{\textendash}120},
	publisher = {Chapman \& Hall, Ltd.},
	address = {Philadelphia, PA, USA},
	isbn = {0-412-82360-8},
	author = {Ngwenyama, O. and Davis, G. and Lyytinen, K and Truex, D. and Cule, P.}
}
@article {278895,
	title = {Panel{\textendash}-the impact of action research on information systems},
	year = {1997},
	pages = {69},
	publisher = {Chapman \& Hall, Ltd.},
	address = {Philadelphia, PA, USA},
	isbn = {0-412-82360-8},
	author = {Baskerville, R. and Myers, M. and Nielsen, P. A. and Wood-Harper, T.}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/JonesN93,
	title = {Structured Development? A Structurational Analysis of the Development of an Executive Information System},
	year = {1993},
	pages = {475-496},
	author = {Matthew Jones and Joe Nandhakumar}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/DaviesN92,
	title = {An Ethnographic Study of Configuration Management and Documentation Practices},
	year = {1992},
	pages = {179-192},
	author = {Lynda Davies and Susan Nielsen}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/BeckerMN92,
	title = {A Preliminary Study on the Group Dynamics of the Cleanroom Systems Development Process},
	year = {1992},
	pages = {97-114},
	author = {Shirley A. Becker and Eugene G. McGuire and Fred Niederman}
}
@article {Nissen,
	title = {{Acquiring Knowledge of Information Systems: Research in a Methodological Quagmire}},
	year = {1985},
	pages = {37{\textendash}51},
	publisher = {Elsevier Publishers},
	author = {Hans-Erik Nissen}
}
