@article {1335,
	title = {Affordance Lost, Affordance Regained, and Affordance Surrendered},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {73{\textendash}89},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	address = {Cham},
	abstract = {Informed by the ontology of becoming, this study explores technological affordances in the context of use of social media technologies where multiple human and material agents interact without necessarily being co-present. In such scenarios, tracing the relational configuration of social and material agents becomes a challenge. So far, extant literature based on the ontology of becoming has only considered the actualization of affordances in the proximal co-presence of other people and objects. Extending this understanding of affordances by using actor-network theory (ANT) as a methodological and conceptual device, this research traces translations of the {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}distant{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} in the form of inscriptions that can travel across space and time. This study points towards the utility of using ANT, over other interpretive methods, as a tool to study complex technological phenomena. It shows that affordances are collective, ongoing accomplishments of diverse actors, some co-present physically and others, though distant, co-present through translated representations.},
	isbn = {978-3-319-49733-4},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-49733-4_5},
	author = {Sharma, Divya and Saha, Biswatosh and Sarkar, Uttam K.},
	editor = {Introna, Lucas and Kavanagh, Donncha and Kelly, S{\'e}amas and Orlikowski, Wanda and Scott, Susan}
}
@article {1334,
	title = {Critical Realism and Actor-Network Theory/Deleuzian Thinking: A Critical Comparison in the Area of Information Systems, Technology and Organizational Studies},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {58{\textendash}72},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	address = {Cham},
	abstract = {Much debate has encircled studies of information systems (IS), technology and organizations with regards to ideas of process, stability and change, performance and materiality. This encapsulates different ways of viewing dualities (e.g. subjective/objective, social/technical, local/global, macro/micro, structure/agency, reality/construction, being/becoming, etc.) as well as alternative ontological and epistemological commitments underlying particular approaches and research perspectives. This paper seeks to explore two specific approaches by focusing on a comparison of critical realism (CR) and actor-network theory (ANT)/Deleuze-inspired forms of inquiry. In particular, we focus on the notion of morphogenesis in order to explore in greater detail how this concept conjures up rather different images in relation to approaches centred around CR and ANT/Deleuze.},
	isbn = {978-3-319-49733-4},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-49733-4_4},
	author = {McLean, Chris and Aroles, Jeremy},
	editor = {Introna, Lucas and Kavanagh, Donncha and Kelly, S{\'e}amas and Orlikowski, Wanda and Scott, Susan}
}
@article {1330,
	title = {A Developmental Perspective to Studying Objects in Robotic Surgery},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {229{\textendash}245},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	address = {Cham},
	abstract = {Drawing on interventionist activity theoretical approaches, this paper describes a method of self-confrontation as a way in which to study objects in technology-mediated practices. In addition to research interests, the aim of examining the objects is to develop the capacity of professionals and organizations to work and learn better in complex technology-mediated work. The method was applied in robotic surgery, in which instruments are tele-operated by a surgeon. The robot offers better, collective visualization of the area under surgical operation than previous techniques. In particular, the paper shows how objects were revealed and new objects emerged during the intervention. We suggest that activity theoretical developmental interventions such as self-confrontations may help understand the complexity and evolution of objects, and thus contribute to studies of technology and organizations.},
	isbn = {978-3-319-49733-4},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-49733-4_14},
	author = {Sepp{\"a}nen, Laura and Kloetzer, Laure and Riikonen, Jarno and Wahlstr{\"o}m, Mikael},
	editor = {Introna, Lucas and Kavanagh, Donncha and Kelly, S{\'e}amas and Orlikowski, Wanda and Scott, Susan}
}
@article {1326,
	title = {Enactment or Performance? A Non-dualist Reading of Goffman},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {167{\textendash}181},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	address = {Cham},
	abstract = {This paper contributes to the sociomateriality research orientation with a critical examination of two concepts {\textendash} enactment and performance {\textendash} that have been associated with the notion of performativity. While a preference for the term enactment has been expressed in influential IS literature, we argue that sociomateriality will benefit from an engagement with the body of research that focuses on Goffman{\textquoteright}s notion of performance. We provide a critique of Mol{\textquoteright}s reading of Goffman{\textquoteright}s notions of {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}persona{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}mask{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}. We then show how a careful non-dualist reading of his work reveals his opus as relevant and useful for sociomateriality, because his notion of performance affords locating technology in differing roles within a performance. In doing so, we argue that Goffman{\textquoteright}s work, largely overlooked within this stream of research so far, contributes important concepts and terminology for making sociomateriality actionable for IS.},
	isbn = {978-3-319-49733-4},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-49733-4_10},
	author = {Hafermalz, Ella and Riemer, Kai and Boell, Sebastian},
	editor = {Introna, Lucas and Kavanagh, Donncha and Kelly, S{\'e}amas and Orlikowski, Wanda and Scott, Susan}
}
@article {1333,
	title = {From Substantialist to Process Metaphysics {\textendash} Exploring Shifts in IS Research},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {35{\textendash}57},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	address = {Cham},
	abstract = {This article examines the shifts in Information Systems (IS) research~from a positivist to interpretive to sociomaterial paradigm by demonstrating how the shifts reflected the move from substantialist towards process metaphysics. Such metaphysical grounding provides a foundation for deeper understanding of paradigm differences and the struggles when shifts occur. After a brief historical overview of substantialist and process metaphysics and a summary of their key assumptions, the article explores paradigm shifts in IS research and highlights the underlying metaphysical nature of surrounding difficulties and controversies.~The article advances the paradigm debate by drawing attention to the metaphysical nature of paradigmatic shifts in IS research and by opening up intellectual space for conceiving and understanding novel research approaches beyond~Burrell and Morgan{\textquoteright}s model [1].},
	isbn = {978-3-319-49733-4},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-49733-4_3},
	author = {Cecez-Kecmanovic, Dubravka},
	editor = {Introna, Lucas and Kavanagh, Donncha and Kelly, S{\'e}amas and Orlikowski, Wanda and Scott, Susan}
}
@article {1336,
	title = {Ideological Materiality at Work: A Lacanian Approach},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {93{\textendash}107},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	address = {Cham},
	abstract = {While recent theoretical debates have foregrounded sociomaterial studies and the interpenetration between the social and the material, practice-based studies have neglected, if not omitted, the place of affect and ideology in work practice. The use of the notion of materiality causes a conflation of different ontological claims, and a conceptual clarification is needed to grasp the polysemy of materiality. This paper provides some key notions for those interested in addressing the materiality of the affective register at work. By drawing on authors such as Lacan, Althusser, Butler and the Essex Lacanian School, this paper suggests that much is to be gained by addressing two difficult but crucial notions: the materiality of the signifier and ideological fantasy.},
	isbn = {978-3-319-49733-4},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-49733-4_6},
	author = {Pignot, Edouard},
	editor = {Introna, Lucas and Kavanagh, Donncha and Kelly, S{\'e}amas and Orlikowski, Wanda and Scott, Susan}
}
@article {1337,
	title = {Inscribing Individuals into a Formalized System: The {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}Labour{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} Performed by Affective Spaces},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {108{\textendash}124},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	address = {Cham},
	abstract = {A substantial amount of ongoing work in organizations can be characterized as processes of formalization in which unique circumstances are rendered legible to organizational frameworks and inscribed into institutionalized ways of knowing and doing. Embedded in these processes is the need to manage, distance, and condition the affective and physical experience of the players involved. Using twelve months of ethnographic data gathered in the Family Law unit of the courts in a large county of California, we explore how formalization happens. We find that a dynamic combination of actants (technologies of formalization) engender affective spaces that serve as passage points in the process of formalization. These affective spaces condition the bodies and emotions of customers in a manner that generally mitigates unstable intensity and renders the customer ready to focus on the {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}facts{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} of the case. We suggest that by attending to the multiple actants in an environment we are able to interrogate both the origin and effects of {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}affect{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} as well as better understand how key passage points work in the service of formalization processes. In so doing we expand the conversation about the challenges of public service delivery and put forth the beginning of a theory of how affective spaces serve organizational and institutional goals.},
	isbn = {978-3-319-49733-4},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-49733-4_7},
	author = {Toll, Alexandra and Mazmanian, Melissa},
	editor = {Introna, Lucas and Kavanagh, Donncha and Kelly, S{\'e}amas and Orlikowski, Wanda and Scott, Susan}
}
@article {1327,
	title = {Performing Cyborgian Identity: Enacting Agential Cuts in Second Life},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {182{\textendash}197},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	address = {Cham},
	abstract = {As people live their lives online more and more, they increasingly rely on digital bodies to extend their senses and to perform identities. With this hybridization of physical and digital embodiments, they become cyborgs and are compelled to negotiate the dualistic space defined by the binary opposition of actual and virtual reality. Whereas actuality typically connotes concrete existence, virtuality signifies phenomena that are ideal, essential and unrealized but that have actual effects.},
	isbn = {978-3-319-49733-4},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-49733-4_11},
	author = {Schultze, Ulrike},
	editor = {Introna, Lucas and Kavanagh, Donncha and Kelly, S{\'e}amas and Orlikowski, Wanda and Scott, Susan}
}
@article {1328,
	title = {Performing Research Validity: A {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}Mangle of Practice{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} Approach},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {201{\textendash}214},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	address = {Cham},
	abstract = {Mainstream discussions of research validity (truth, significance, objectivity) draw heavily on a certain {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}representational idiom{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} of science [1] that assumes a knowledge{\textendash}reality correspondence. However, for research on practices, rather than nature, such a knowledge-reality distinction is neither feasible nor desirable, as it is at odds with the very notion of a {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}practice{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}. Drawing on Pickering{\textquoteright}s alternative {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}performative idiom{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} for science, and extending it to participatory forms of social research, we propose alternative validity claims for practice-oriented research. Using the example of information infrastructuring practices, we show that the three aspects of validity thus reinterpreted become quite closely related to each other and also to the process of information infrastructuring itself. In so doing, we demonstrate the importance of extending the notion of {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}material agency{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} to embrace the dual agencies of the practice studied and the researcher{\textquoteright}s own disciplinary practice.},
	isbn = {978-3-319-49733-4},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-49733-4_12},
	author = {Johnston, Robert B. and Reimers, Kai and Klein, Stefan},
	editor = {Introna, Lucas and Kavanagh, Donncha and Kelly, S{\'e}amas and Orlikowski, Wanda and Scott, Susan}
}
@article {1339,
	title = {A Relational Approach to Materiality and Organizing: The Case of a Creative Idea},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {143{\textendash}166},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	address = {Cham},
	abstract = {In this paper, we propose to go beyond the notion of entanglement that has been proposed in recent years to fill the so-called gap between {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}the social{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}the material{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}, especially in organizational studies. While this notion rightly invites us to reconsider the way we traditionally approach the question of materiality and organizing, we believe that its formulation tends to implicitly reproduce the gap it claims to fill. In contrast, we propose a view according to which sociality and materiality should, in fact, be considered aspects of everything that comes to be and exist. Throughout the analysis of an episode taken from fieldwork devoted to creative teams, we show that things as abstract as ideas, for instance, in order to emerge, exist, and continue to exist, have to materialize themselves in various identifiable beings. While the sociality of an idea is identified through the various relations that make it what it is, we show that its materiality comes from what precisely materializes these relations.},
	isbn = {978-3-319-49733-4},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-49733-4_9},
	author = {Martine, Thomas and Cooren, Fran{\c c}ois},
	editor = {Introna, Lucas and Kavanagh, Donncha and Kelly, S{\'e}amas and Orlikowski, Wanda and Scott, Susan}
}
@article {1329,
	title = {Synthetic Situations in the Internet of Things},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {215{\textendash}228},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	address = {Cham},
	abstract = {The proliferation of distributed digital technologies in contemporary enterprise challenges the understanding of situated action. This paper revisits this notion in the era of Big Data and the Internet of Things. Drawing upon longitudinal studies within the offshore oil and gas industry, we empirically expand upon Knorr Cetina{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}synthetic situation{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} to encompass data-intensive work where people are not co-located with the physical objects and phenomena around which work is organized. By highlighting the performative nature of synthetic situations in the Internet of Things {\textendash} where phenomena are algorithmically enacted through digital technologies {\textendash} we elaborate upon the original formulation of synthetic situations by demonstrating that (i) algorithmic phenomena constitute the phenomena under inquiry, rather than standing in for physical referents; (ii) noise is irreducible in algorithmic phenomena; (iii) synthetic situations are productive rather than reductive. Finally, we draw brief methodological implications by proposing to focus on the material enactment of data in practice.},
	isbn = {978-3-319-49733-4},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-49733-4_13},
	author = {Parmiggiani, Elena and Monteiro, Eric and {\O}sterlie, Thomas},
	editor = {Introna, Lucas and Kavanagh, Donncha and Kelly, S{\'e}amas and Orlikowski, Wanda and Scott, Susan}
}
@article {1332,
	title = {Thoughts on Movement, Growth and an Anthropologically-Sensitive IS/Organization Studies: An Imagined Correspondence with Tim Ingold},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {17{\textendash}32},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	address = {Cham},
	abstract = {In what follows, we present the outcome of an imagined dialogue with Tim Ingold on possible future directions for an anthropologically-sensitive approach to studying Information Systems (IS) and Organization Studies (OS). The aim is to try to convey some of the strangeness and freshness that we have found in his thought, with a view to stimulating IS/OS scholars to engage further with his work and ideas. The piece takes the form of an imagined Q{\&}A session with Tim, which we have synthesized from excerpts of previously published interviews and writings.},
	isbn = {978-3-319-49733-4},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-49733-4_2},
	author = {Ingold, Tim and Introna, Lucas and Kavanagh, Donncha and Kelly, S{\'e}amas and Orlikowski, Wanda and Scott, Susan},
	editor = {Introna, Lucas and Kavanagh, Donncha and Kelly, S{\'e}amas and Orlikowski, Wanda and Scott, Susan}
}
@article {1331,
	title = {What if the Screens Went Black? The Coming of Software Agents},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {3{\textendash}16},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	address = {Cham},
	abstract = {Trading screens are not supposed to be black. In fact, when we see them on trading floors, on TV, or in media centres, they attract us with catching colours and blinking information. They project urgency, speed, and power {\textendash} the power of big money, the power of winning and losing. When we are near them, we feel their heat. We want to give in to their considerable attraction. We want to be players of the game and part of the action.},
	isbn = {978-3-319-49733-4},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-49733-4_1},
	author = {Cetina, Karin Knorr},
	editor = {Introna, Lucas and Kavanagh, Donncha and Kelly, S{\'e}amas and Orlikowski, Wanda and Scott, Susan}
}
@article {1338,
	title = {When Is an Affordance? Outlining Four Stances},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {125{\textendash}139},
	publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
	address = {Cham},
	abstract = {Affordance has emerged as a core concept in information systems (IS) research during the last decade. This relational concept is applied to understand and theorize the relationship between the social and the technical. In the works of the concept originator James Gibson, the relation was mainly portrayed as an ever-existing fact between the natural environment and an animal. In contrast, IS research focuses on relationships in-the-making between artificial things and human beings. In the IS context, we have identified vagueness in temporal and relational ontology: when do affordances exist and between whom or what? In this paper, we delve into the temporal and relational questions that have been omitted in much of the IS literature. What kind of a relationship is an affordance and when does it occur? Based on our hermeneutic understanding, we identify four stances from the existing literature. We classify those stances as canonical affordance, designed affordance, potential affordance, and affordance as completed action. We further argue that each stance has its own assumptions, consequences, and thus strengths and weaknesses.},
	isbn = {978-3-319-49733-4},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-49733-4_8},
	author = {Lanam{\"a}ki, Arto and Thapa, Devinder and Stendal, Karen},
	editor = {Introna, Lucas and Kavanagh, Donncha and Kelly, S{\'e}amas and Orlikowski, Wanda and Scott, Susan}
}
@article {georgiadou2011sensors,
	title = {Sensors, empowerment, and accountability: a Digital Earth view from East Africa},
	journal = {International Journal of Digital Earth},
	volume = {4},
	number = {4},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {285{\textendash}304},
	publisher = {Taylor \& Francis Group},
	author = {Georgiadou, Yola and Bana, Benson and Becht, Robert and Hoppe, Robert and Ikingura, Justinian and Kraak, Menno-Jan and Lance, Kate and Lemmens, Rob and Lungo, Juma Hemed and McCall, Michael and others}
}
@article {georgiadou2011sensorsafrica,
	title = {Sensors, empowerment, and accountability: A digital earth view from East Africa},
	journal = {International Journal of Digital Earth},
	volume = {4},
	number = {4},
	year = {2011},
	month = {Jul},
	pages = {285{\textendash}304},
	abstract = {Several innovative {\textquoteright}participatory sensing{\textquoteright} initiatives are under way in East Africa. They can be seen as local manifestations of the global notion of Digital Earth. The initiatives aim to amplify the voice of ordinary citizens, improve citizens{\textquoteright} capacity to directly influence public service delivery and hold local government accountable. The popularity of these innovations is, among other things, a local reaction to the partial failure of the millennium development goals (MDGs) to deliver accurate statistics on public services in Africa. Empowered citizens, with access to standard mobile phones, can {\textquoteright}sense{\textquoteright} via text messages and report failures in the delivery of local government services. The public disclosure of these reports on the web and other mass media may pressure local authorities to take remedial action. In this paper, we outline the potential and research challenges of a {\textquoteright}participatory sensing{\textquoteright} platform, which we call a {\textquoteright}human sensor web.{\textquoteright} Digital Africa{\textquoteright}s first priority could be to harness continent-wide and national data as well as local information resources, collected by citizens, in order to monitor, measure and forecast MDGs. {\textcopyright} 2011 Taylor \&Francis.},
	issn = {1753-8947},
	doi = {10.1080/17538947.2011.585184},
	author = {Georgiadou, Y and Bana, B and Becht, R and Hoppe, R and Ikingura, J and Kraak, MJ and Lance, K and Lemmens, R and Lungo, JH and Mccall, M and Miscione, G and Verplanke, J}
}
@article {1065,
	title = {The Social Design of Information Systems},
	volume = {356},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {287-290},
	publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
	isbn = {978-3-642-21363-2},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-21364-9_18},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21364-9_18},
	author = {Steve Sawyer and Venkatesh, Murali and Juhani Iivari and Cathy Urquhart and Light, Ben},
	editor = {Chiasson, Mike and Ola Henfridsson and Helena Karsten and DeGross, JaniceI.}
}
@proceedings {451,
	title = {Power, knowledge and management information systems education: The case of the Indian learner},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {1723-1736},
	address = {Milwaukee, WI},
	url = {ICIS2006.pdf},
	author = {Niall Hayes and Edgar A. Whitley and Lucas D. Introna},
	editor = {Straub, Detmar and Stefan Klein}
}
@proceedings {450,
	title = {Plagiarism, values and computing: differing cultural expectations of academic work in information systems education},
	year = {2005},
	address = {Ealing, London},
	isbn = {3-937195-09-2},
	url = {BEST2005.pdf},
	author = {Niall Hayes and Lucas D. Introna and Edgar A. Whitley}
}
@article {364,
	title = {The Technology Environment: Subjectivity, Language, and Machine},
	journal = {International Journal of Technology and Design Education},
	volume = {15},
	year = {2005},
	month = {2005/01/01/},
	pages = {99 - 110},
	abstract = {The question raised here is about the extent that liberal individualism and the consumerist ethos is the result of technology and to what extent is it the cultural norm of modernity. There has been a polarization in the way technology is understood. Predominantly it is assumed to be neutral but it can also be argued that technology exacerbates the understanding of people as {\textquoteleft}rational individual utility maximisers.{\textquoteright} C.A. Bowers argues that computer technology amplifies the conduit model of learning. The machine stores information and the student learns how to retrieve it and this constitutes neutral and objective research. Bowers advocates critical enquiry and an awareness of the socio-cultural factors that contribute to the generation of knowledge and community. The physiological parameters of machines are neither neutral nor strictly political. Technology shifts the constraints of phenomenological experience and encourages new and arguably impoverished ways of experiencing the world. However, by insisting on a critical dimension to understanding technology we could be able to transform education from its emphasis on vocationalism and governmentality to a more creative, equitable, and ecological set of factors.},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10798-005-8278-0},
	author = {Irwin, Ruth}
}
@booklet {333,
	title = {Extrinsic Camera Parameter Recovery from Multiple Image Sequences Captured by an Omni-Directional Multi-camera System},
	howpublished = {Computer Vision - ECCV 2004},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004///},
	pages = {326 - 340},
	abstract = {Recently, many types of omni-directional cameras have been developed and attracted much attention in a number of different fields. Especially, the multi-camera type of omni-directional camera has advantages of high-resolution and almost uniform resolution for any direction of view. In this paper, an extrinsic camera parameter recovery method for a moving omni-directional multi-camera system (OMS) is proposed. First, we discuss a perspective n-point (PnP) problem for an OMS, and then describe a practical method for estimating extrinsic camera parameters from multiple image sequences obtained by an OMS. The proposed method is based on using the shape-from-motion and the PnP techniques.},
	url = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/fuhnhnka3dvb5lc7},
	author = {Sato, Tomokazu and Ikeda, Sei and Yokoya, Naokazu}
}
@article {273,
	title = {Truth, Journals, and Politics: The Case of the MIS Quarterly},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004},
	pages = {103 - 120},
	abstract = {In this paper, we want to demonstrate the way in which regimes of truth at the MIS Quarterly (MISQ) have made it possible for certain types of research to be published there, and others not. The importance of this claim lies in the fact that publication in MISQ is often seen as an indication of status. Furthermore, publication in MISQ also plays an important role in decisions about tenure and promotion. However, the aim of the paper is not to rid MISQ of regimes of truth{\textemdash}this is not possible. The paper will argue, with Foucault, that all institutions always already have their politics of truth. The production of truth is always intimately tied to relations of power which itself depends upon truth for its sustenance. The aim of the paper is to show this intimate connection between truth and power. In particular, in the case of MISQ, we want to question the often-implied legitimacy and status that the MISQ has over and against other high quality journals in the field. Foucault argues that power is most effective when it hides itself. This paper is an attempt to make its face more public and open to scrutiny.},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_7},
	author = {Introna, Lucas and Louise Whittaker}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/IntronaW02,
	title = {The Phenomenology of Information Systems Evaluation: Overcoming the Subject/Object Dualism},
	year = {2002},
	pages = {155-175},
	author = {Lucas D. Introna and Louise Whittaker}
}
@booklet {571,
	title = {Sociology and ethics of information systems: External programme study guide},
	year = {2001},
	publisher = {University of London},
	edition = {Second edition},
	address = {London},
	author = {Lucas D. Introna and Edgar A. Whitley}
}
@article {508,
	title = {About experiments and style: A critique of laboratory research in information systems},
	journal = {Information technology and people},
	volume = {13},
	number = {3},
	year = {2000},
	pages = {161-173},
	isbn = {0959-3845},
	url = {ITP2000.pdf},
	author = {Lucas D. Introna and Edgar A. Whitley}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/IntronaI00,
	title = {The Screen and the World: A Phenomenological Investigation into Screens and Our Engagement in the World},
	year = {2000},
	pages = {295-318},
	author = {Lucas D. Introna and Fernando M. Ilharco}
}
@booklet {570,
	title = {Sociology and ethics of information systems: External programme study guide},
	year = {2000},
	publisher = {University of London},
	edition = {First edition},
	address = {London},
	author = {Lucas D. Introna and Edgar A. Whitley}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/NgwenyamaIM99,
	title = {Building on a Decade of Research on IT and Organizations},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {1-10},
	author = {Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama and Lucas D. Introna and Michael D. Myers}
}
@inbook {918,
	title = {Building on a Decade of Research on IT and Organizations},
	booktitle = {New Information Technologies in Organizational Processes: Field Studies and Theoretical Reflections on the Future of Work},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {1-7},
	publisher = {Kluwer Academic Publishers},
	organization = {Kluwer Academic Publishers},
	address = {Norwell, MA},
	keywords = {IFIP 8.2},
	author = {Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama and Lucas D. Introna and Michael D. Myers},
	editor = {Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama and Lucas D. Introna and Michael D. Myers and Janice I. DeGross}
}
@booklet {919,
	title = {New Information Technologies in Organizational Processes: Field Studies and Theoretical Reflections on the Future of Work},
	year = {1999},
	publisher = {Kluwer Academic Publishers},
	address = {Norwell, MA},
	keywords = {IFIP 8.2},
	author = {Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama and Lucas D. Introna and Michael D. Myers and Janice I. DeGross}
}
@article {548,
	title = {Social theory and Y2K},
	volume = {33},
	number = {2},
	year = {1999},
	month = {November},
	pages = {6},
	author = {Edgar A. Whitley and Lucas D. Introna}
}
@article {535,
	title = {Special issue on Heidegger and information technology},
	journal = {Information technology and people},
	volume = {11},
	number = {4},
	year = {1998},
	isbn = {0959-3845},
	url = {./heideggerspecialissue/},
	author = {Edgar A. Whitley and Lucas D. Introna}
}
@article {506,
	title = {Against method-},
	journal = {Information technology and people},
	volume = {10},
	number = {1},
	year = {1997},
	pages = {31-45},
	isbn = {0959-3845},
	url = {ITP1997Method.pdf},
	author = {Lucas D. Introna and Edgar A. Whitley}
}
@article {507,
	title = {Against method-},
	journal = {Logistics information management},
	volume = {10},
	number = {5},
	year = {1997},
	pages = {235-245},
	isbn = {0957-6053},
	url = {ITP1997Method.pdf},
	author = {Lucas D. Introna and Edgar A. Whitley}
}
@article {278920,
	title = {Imagine: thought experiments in information systems research},
	year = {1997},
	pages = {481{\textendash}496},
	publisher = {Chapman \& Hall, Ltd.},
	address = {Philadelphia, PA, USA},
	isbn = {0-412-82360-8},
	author = {Introna, L. D. and Whitley, E. A.}
}
@proceedings {492,
	title = {Studying the involved computer user: A phenomenological approach},
	year = {1997},
	month = {August 15-17},
	pages = {327-329},
	address = {Indianapolis, Indiana},
	url = {AMCIS1997.pdf},
	author = {Edgar A. Whitley and Julika Siemer and Lucas D. Introna},
	editor = {JND Gupta}
}
@article {547,
	title = {How do you make a deal when you can{\textquoteright}t shake hands?},
	volume = {1},
	number = {2},
	year = {1996},
	month = {June},
	pages = {32,34},
	isbn = {1363-979X},
	author = {Edgar A. Whitley and Lucas D. Introna}
}
@proceedings {455,
	title = {Information systems as a social science? The individual perspective},
	year = {1996},
	pages = {814-816},
	publisher = {AIS},
	address = {Phoenix, Arizona},
	url = {AMCIS1996.pdf},
	author = {Lucas D. Introna and Edgar A. Whitley},
	editor = {Jane M Carey}
}
@proceedings {454,
	title = {Thinking about obligations in electronically mediated communication},
	year = {1996},
	publisher = {University of Hohenheim},
	address = {Lisbon, Portugal},
	url = {SISnet1996.pdf},
	author = {Lucas D. Introna and Edgar A. Whitley},
	editor = {Helmut Krcmar and B Schwarzer}
}
@article {DBLP:conf/ifip8-2/Iivari93,
	title = {From a Macro Innovation Theory of IS Diffusion to a Micro Innovation Theory of IS Adoption: An Application to CASE Adoption},
	year = {1993},
	pages = {295-320},
	author = {Juhani Iivari}
}
